The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in to your account.Don't have an account? Register
Florida (backed by flood insurance requirements) is forcing storm resilience for new construction and major remodeling along its coasts. Of course a lot of construction consists of demolishing modest older houses, replacing them with far grander new ones. In my county (Indian River), the value of vulnerable residential real estate is skyrocketing. The residents are quite largely Republican, though Romney was far more popular than Trump.
Unfortunately, Miami Beach's program to raise streets to lessen regular non-storm flooding is proving unpopular with residents. I wonder about expensive programs to rebuild gates for storm drainage systems and to install pumps.
The problem in the U.S. isn't climate change. It is the utter failure of the authorities at every level to keep people from building in vulnerable locations.
(America has done a rotten job of dealing with Hurricane Trump)
I personally think President Trump ought to be re-elected and re-elected until he hears the coda to his own music and faces the conequences of his own flip-flops to all Americans. The process will take more than 4 more years. No more subterfuge by distraction and shifting of subject. America is not an Atlantic City casino; neither is the world.